Your Brain on Love

Is love a feeling or a chemical reaction? What is the brain science of attraction? What is the physical reality of heartbreak?

Neuropsychologist Dr. Jena Kravitz explains it all in episode 8 of Drinking With Socrates. Click here to listen on iTunes.

If you enjoy the show please leave some stars and a review. We love hearing from our listeners! Instagram @Socratespod

Not So Great…Again

The above photo was captured at the Lincoln Memorial where Nathan Phillips, veteran and of the Omaha Nation, played tribute with song and drum despite being confronted and mocked by youth in MAGA hats. *

I want to know what their high school curriculum looks like.  What books are these students reading?  Who are their history teachers?  They are students at a Catholic School.  What the hell are they being taught in their religion studies? 

I’m a mixture of sorrow, anger, and disgust. 

The students proudly wear their MAGA hats and by doing so in conjunction with their awful behavior actually confirm the very thing that makes the slogan so upsetting: “America Great Again” denies the history of America.  It represents a myopic view of America.  Or, it represents a view of America that is only fitting for the white.  Perhaps the latter view is what makes the student’s smug expression so disturbing. 

The United States has within its heart, I believe, the capacity for greatness, but that cannot come to fruition if we obscure the reality of suffering, a reality these youth in their MAGA hats seem to have no awareness of.  In response to this display some have called to punch these youth in the face.  That is not a solution.  The viral video of their actions will have its own set of consequences.  Ignorance cannot be combatted with violence.  The youth’s expression and the background chants “build a wall” were cultivated by years bereft of empathy and intellectual engagement. That’s the problem. That’s where we begin.

But let’s shed the notion that suffering and exploitation are not part and parcel of American history.  Let’s face the harm and elevate those who were brave enough to go against the cultural tide and push our society closer to greatness.  Let’s examine our reading lists.  Let’s call out injustice and prejudice.  Let’s learn.  And then let’s read some more.  Let’s read the voices that are far from our own.  Let’s vow to pass on stories of those who can no longer speak for themselves.  Let’s eradicate any sentiment of joy (or conditioning of) humiliating another.  Let’s be in awe and appreciation of each other.

*It has been reported that Nathan Phillips approached the teens and initiated the “confrontation.” That being said, I’m not sure it undermines the problem with the youth’s behavior. Rather than stepping aside for an elder or being curious or showing deference they chose to laugh. The disrespect remains a central issue. In addition there’s been a wide spread call for the names of the youth. I am not at all in favor of a mob mentality attacking the teens. It is the wrong response.

Bad Blood

While visiting a friend she fished a hefty book out of her living room, handed it to me, and said she hadn’t seen her wife for two days so engrossing had the book been.  That sort of endorsement is, for me, as seductive as a dirty martini at Friday Happy Hour. 

I settled into the book right away: Bad Blood Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup. It details the foundation, building, and ultimate downfall of the company Theranos.  A medical device was promised to revolutionize blood-testing.  People bought in.  There were millions invested.  Publicity ensued.

The engineers of the company told the founder, Elizabeth Holmes, the promise of this technology could not be kept.  Her solution was to hide the malfunctions and continue to promise the technology.  Eventually, the truth surfaced.  The blood-testing device produced false results and the consequences, if left unchecked, could have been dire.  Medications, diagnosis, and procedures hinge on the veracity of a blood test result. 

Three things come to mind as I reflect on this book. 

  1. There was a genuine desire to report on and see the success of a young woman in the tech industry.  But because the media interest focused on Elizabeth Holmes the actual integrity of the blood-testing device was either overshadowed or nonexistent.  The very notion of ambition must be revisited here and I yield to the writings of Aristotle for clarity.  Ambition as such should be in conjunction with excellence.  It is the practice of contemplation and a steady work of character.  It cannot be obfuscated with notions of power and domination.  Holmes’s handling of investments and empty guarantees were spawned not by ambition but by greed.  In Aristotle’s terms this constitutes an excess of character or a vice.  Financial gain and power are not in and of themselves problematic, but they can be when in lieu of excellence rather than the result of excellence.  
  2. The unraveling and deceit of Theranos is an important story to tell.  It also highlights the gravity of journalism in a day when the field finds itself under attack and called “fake” or “enemy of the people.”  In truth, many people could have suffered from this poorly designed tool; yet, quality journalism unearthed the magnitude of the company’s flaws and outright false claims.  Indeed, one woman spent a Thanksgiving evening in the ER due to a false blood test result from this Theranos device.  After undergoing a deluge of further testing that ultimately cost her $3,000 out of pocket, she learned there was nothing wrong with her.  What if she had been ill and the blood test came back clean?  That was just one of the many incidents reported.
  3. I cannot help but draw parallels between Theranos and the Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster (1986). In both cases the engineers informed management of serious difficulties.  With the case of the Challenger the O-ring was a vulnerable part of the shuttle and in cold temperatures would fail.  This was explained to the business side of the launch and ignored. Seven astronauts lost their lives.  Why would the Challenger launch when on the eve before the engineers told management it was doomed to fail?  Why would Holmes ignore her own engineers?  Scheduling.  Business.  Because management told too many people it was ready.  The essence of the failures underscoring both cases looks eerily similar, namely, the image of the company and possible profits drowned out the very purpose of these endeavors: human excellence, knowledge, and innovation.

On Love, Same-sex Relationships, and Christianity

Drinking with Socrates podcast featured an interview with Reverend Elizabeth McQuitty! Click here for SoundCloud. We’re also on iTunes.

We discuss faith, love, and tackle the question on the compatibility of same-sex relationships in the context of religion.  This was an absolute delight to record and I hope you enjoy the show!

IMG_0741IMG_0750Instagram: @gdol10 @mikeracanelli @Socratespod

In Another’s Shoes

If you are terrified of a caravan of people 1,000 miles away trekking north then I propose a challenge.  Go for a ten mile walk today and reflect on how/why your family came to the United States.  How is your life possible because of your family’s decision?  When you end your walk and your feet ache take a moment to be grateful.

And if you think But I don’t have time to do a ten mile walk!  I have duties at home, laundry to tend to, meals to prepare, Netflix to binge, catch up with work, plans with my family and my friends!

Well, then…let that sink in.

A Discussion on Sex Work

Episode 1 of Drinking With Socrates is now on iTunes and SoundCloud.



My co-host Mike Racanelli and I are talking with writer/activist/teacher/sex worker Antonia Crane.  Check out her memoir Spent.

Please give it a listen, a like, a star rating, or feel free to leave feedback in the comments below.

Instagram: @mikeracanelli @gdol10 @Socratespod

A Homework Assignment

For my Philosophy 340 class, Current Debates in Sexuality, (also sometimes called Philosophy of Sex and Love), I gave the following assignment:

Find an article that has been written in the last two weeks with a reference/discussion about sexual assault.  Bring this to class.  I clarified that they needn’t agree with the article because the point was to examine how sexual assault is being presented in media.

Come class time the students had their articles, and I put them into groups of 3 and 4 to share with each other the content of the articles.  The room immediately roared to life with their exchanges.

It turned out to be a good exercise.  In terms of teaching methodology I enjoy when textbook theory can be highlighted and demonstrated in either fiction/film or current events. I don’t want my students to merely memorize an argument or a few definitions for the semester.  Engagement and discussion is key to making material from courses one’s own.

I must confess, I was surprised that out of 40 students no one brought the same article.



%d bloggers like this: